โ† Back to global tracker
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช

Country deep dive

Sweden

Europe ยท SE ยท VAT area: EU
Last updated: 21 July 2026
Compliance model: Fully decentralised โ€” no domestic B2B mandate
๐Ÿ”Ž Sweden has no legislated domestic B2B mandate. What's genuinely new: a national inquiry into ViDA implementation launched 5 February 2026, explicitly tasked with assessing whether to mandate domestic B2B/G2B e-invoicing, with findings due no later than 30 November 2027.
2008
First partial B2G mandate
Peppol BIS 3.0
Preferred format
No B2B
Domestic mandate โ€” none yet
7 yrs
Archive requirement
Nov 2027
National ViDA inquiry due
01

Compliance timeline

Sweden has one of Europe's longest e-invoicing track records in the public sector โ€” and one of its more open questions about whether that ever extends to private business.

2008
2008In effect
First partial B2G mandate โ€” central government agencies

All invoices sent to central public administrations must be electronic, alongside the creation of DIGG's predecessor functions to steer public-sector digitalisation.

2018โ€“2019
2018 (Act 2018:1277)In effect
Act on Electronic Invoicing in Public Procurement

Transposes EU Directive 2014/55/EU into Swedish law, setting the legal foundation for the full public-sector mandate that follows.

1 Apr 2019In effect
Full EN 16931 mandate for all public procurement

All central and sub-central public procurement contracting authorities and suppliers โ€” above and below EU thresholds, including direct procurement โ€” must comply using the Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 CIUS.

1 Dec 2019In effect
Extended to all regional and municipal administrations

Full public-sector coverage achieved โ€” every entity wishing to trade with public authorities must be connected to the Peppol network.

February 2023
Feb 2023In effect
DIGG, Skatteverket and Bolagsverket jointly request a B2B/G2B assessment

The three agencies formally ask the government to evaluate introducing a domestic B2B and G2B e-invoicing mandate โ€” the first concrete institutional push beyond the existing voluntary approach.

2025
1 Mar 2025In effect
Tullverket (Swedish Customs) adopts Peppol BIS Billing 3

Sweden's customs authority begins using Peppol BIS for invoicing customs duties, taxes, and fees โ€” a sign of the format's continued spread even without a general legal mandate.

1 Jul 2025In effect
SFTI phases out legacy formats as "recommended" standards

Svefaktura and SFTI ESAP 6 Fulltextfaktura are no longer recommended for new public procurement projects โ€” Peppol BIS becomes the preferred format, though legacy formats remain technically accepted for now.

February 2026
5 Feb 2026Due soon
National ViDA implementation inquiry launched

The Ministry of Finance formally launches an inquiry into how ViDA should be implemented in Swedish law. A commissioner is appointed to examine necessary legislative changes, assess whether domestic B2B e-invoicing should be mandated, and consider how Skatteverket might use e-invoicing data for VAT administration and fraud prevention.

November 2027
By 30 Nov 2027Upcoming
Inquiry findings due

This is the concrete date to watch โ€” it will determine whether Sweden follows its Nordic neighbours into a legislated domestic B2B mandate, or continues with the current voluntary, high-adoption approach.

02

File format & data specification

Sweden has never operated a single mandated national schema the way Norway (EHF) or Denmark (OIOUBL) do โ€” it went straight to the European standard.

Current formats

PreferredPeppol BIS Billing 3.0 (UBL, EN 16931)
Legacy, still acceptedSvefaktura 1.0 / 2.0
Legacy, being phased outSFTI ESAP 6 Fulltextfaktura, EDIFACT

Many Swedish businesses still use Svefaktura for B2B trading โ€” if you're integrating with Swedish partners, be ready to support both Peppol BIS and the older national formats for a while yet.

Signature & archiving

Digital signatureNot required
Retention period7 years

No electronic signature requirement applies to either public- or private-sector invoices โ€” a genuinely lighter-touch requirement than Italy's mandatory XAdES/CAdES.

No national CIUS beyond Peppol BIS

National extensionsNone beyond the Peppol BIS Billing CIUS itself

Unlike Croatia's HR-FISK or Romania's RO_CIUS, there's no additional Swedish-specific layer of mandatory fields to learn โ€” the standard European profile is what applies.

Standard VAT invoice content

RequirementStandard Swedish VAT invoice content rules apply regardless of format

Whichever format you use, the underlying legal content requirements for a valid Swedish VAT invoice remain the same โ€” the format question is about structure, not substance.

03

Transmission protocol

There is genuinely no central Swedish platform โ€” this is one of the purest decentralised models in this tracker.

No central platform

Government portalNone exists
Everything routes viaThe Peppol network

Every invoice moves through Peppol Access Points โ€” there's nothing resembling Croatia's AMS, Poland's KSeF, or even Norway's ELMA as a distinct government-run directory layer.

Governance

DIGGSwedish Peppol Authority (currently being merged into PTS)
SFTIStandards body โ€” Single Face to Industry โ€” not a transmission platform
SkatteverketTax Agency; a co-sponsor of the B2B mandate assessment

DIGG's ongoing merger with the Post and Telecom Authority (PTS) may shift the day-to-day contact point for Peppol Authority matters โ€” watch for updated guidance during the transition.

Finding a trading partner

ToolPeppol Online Directory
What it showsConnection status, accepted formats, business identifiers (GLN or VAT number)

Use the directory to check whether a specific Swedish counterparty is Peppol-connected and which formats/identifiers it accepts before you build an integration around assumptions.

B2B today: voluntary but common

Legal requirementNone
Practical realityHigh adoption, increasingly expected by larger buyers

Nothing stops two Swedish businesses from exchanging structured e-invoices today by mutual agreement โ€” many already do, well ahead of any legal requirement to.

04

Getting ready

With no domestic B2B mandate, "getting ready" here means positioning sensibly rather than meeting a hard deadline.

If you supply Swedish public bodies, confirm Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 capability

Connect via a certified Access Point or approved e-invoicing service provider โ€” this remains firmly mandatory for the public sector.

Check the Peppol Online Directory before building integrations

Confirm your Swedish counterparty's connection status and which formats/identifiers they accept โ€” don't assume Peppol BIS 3.0 universally, given legacy format persistence.

Migrate off Svefaktura and SFTI ESAP 6 where practical

These formats are being actively discouraged, even though still technically accepted โ€” moving to Peppol BIS 3.0 now avoids a scramble later.

For B2B, there's nothing to register for โ€” just monitor the inquiry

Track the national ViDA implementation inquiry, due by 30 November 2027, since its findings will determine whether and how a domestic mandate emerges.

Set up standard 7-year archiving

Ensure your e-invoice records meet the retention period regardless of which format you're using.

05

Related context & open questions

No penalty framework exists for B2B because no mandate exists yet โ€” the real story here is what the 2026 inquiry might produce.

DIGG โ€” Swedish Peppol Authority